June 2011 us history regents exam?

just a thought and im sorry to pose a question on your question...i took the same approach you did with the dbq. i said they were both completely different...however the documents related to the 1930s didnt help the argument that i wanted to make. only one of them did. so i used 6 documents, 5regarding the 1920s and 1 regarding the 1930s...and then for the 1930s paragraph it was essentially 100% outside information that had nothing to do with the documents. i talked about greater restraints on teh economy, FDR prolonging the depression and how at the end of the decade unemployment rate was still above 20%, bread lines, and just some other info that was unrelated to the docs...it proved my point was totally unrelated to those docs they gave. do you think that was ok?